Blog

Physician Vs NP: Five Opinions

 

Earlier this week, the American Academy of Family Physicians released a report entitled Primary Care For The 21st Century: Ensuring A Quality, Physician-Led Team For Every Patient. I talked about this report on this week's podcast. Following the release of this report, there has been a lot of discussion, including this twitter chat following my podcast.

At issue is the question about who should be the leader of the health care team - The Physician or the Independent Nurse Practitioner. There have been long form essays written about this report, and I will include links and quotes below from the five I think are interesting, and you can decide for yourself how you feel about this issue.

Nurse Practitioners No Substitute For Physician Led Team: Roland Goertz, MD from AAFP

  • Granting independent practice to nurse practitioners would create two classes of care: one run by a physician-led team and one run by less-qualified health care professionals. Physicians are required to complete 16,000 more hours of training than nurse practitioners
  • At a time when the AAFP is advocating a team-based approach to health care to improve outcomes and lower costs, some nurse practitioners are eager to go it alone. Our report makes a strong statement that the patient-centered medical home model is designed to be run with a physician leading a team of health care professionals.

 

From American Academy of Nurse Practitioners: Angela Golden, DNP, FNP-C

  • The American Academy of Nurse Practitioners strongly supports patient-centered and team-based care models. However, the AANP believes that AAFP's efforts to link these evolving models of care with the licensure of nurse practioner practice are misdirected and out of step with today's environment.
  • Making full use of the NP workforce is a critical piece of a multi-pronged solution to address the urgent need for health care access in our nation. The ongoing attempts by the AAFP to limit the ability of NPs to practice to the full extent of their education and training only serves to increase the already overwhelming hardships placed on millions of Americans who are struggling to gain access to high quality health care.

 

Nurse Practitioners, Scope of Practice, and Turf - CKRN

  • Frankly, I find this statement condescending and disheartening. First of all, the statement over simplifies a much more complicated issue. Yes, I believe in removing barriers to nurse practitioner scope of practice. One practical reason for this is that when nurse practitioners are authorized to diagnose and prescribe, they can bill more comprehensively for services. If nurse practitioners cannot bill for services, they aren't useful additions to the health care team.
  • The way the AAFP has presented their argument leaves me throughly disheartened... With one statement, the specialty that made me believe in the future of healthcare has made me feel like a second class citizen... Believe it or not, that attitude doesn't make me want to collaborate.

 

The Business Case For Nurse Practitioners - Brian Klepper, PhD

  • Why has AAFP taken a public stance against nurse practitioners extending primary care services, but ignored specialists usurping a significant portion of primary care business? An August 2012 study found tht 41% of primary care office visits were provided by specialists.
  • Primary care is in decline because it has been compromised by a health care industry that wants direct patient access to lucrative downstream services. But primary care's leadership also has complicity, because it has failed to compellingly convey primary care's value and allowed others to define it.

 

Patients Are The Real Leaders In The Patient-Centered Medical Home - Kevin Bernstein, MD

  • Our medical home team has a team leader. At any time, it can be a nurse, a physician, or whoever is available to take charge and make sure our patients are cared for. That's the point.
  • Whether or not it needs to be a physician or nurse practitioner - the evidence is definitely lacking. However, when looking at the IOM report for nursing and the AAFP report for the future of primary care, the only thing that really sticks out to me is the idea we should be working together in collaboration. The national organizations can spin their reports and backlashes however they would like. Unfortunately, this is what media will do for a news story.
  • Who is the leader in the Patient-Centered Medical Home? The answer is easy - Our Patients. And they deserve the right for increased access to a team of providers - physicians, nurse practitioners, not practicing independently - who all need to be leaders for the patient's ability to achieve a healthier life.

Wrap-up FamMedRocks Ep 278

Thanks again to our pal Dr. Gerry Tolbert, host of the Here's To Your Health podcast, for joining me for Family Medicine Rocks Episode 278 where we talked about a new report released by the American Academy of Family Physicians entitled Primary Care For the 21st Century: Ensuring A Quality, Physician-Led Team For Every Patient.

As of the publishing of this post, there are 19 comments right here. And, it is the comments to this article that are most interesting. Opinions are on both sides of this one - supporting the AAFP paper, and against the views in the paper. There have already been several essays written on both points of view on this AAFP paper. I'll address those in a future blog post. 

In addition to this AAFP position paper, Dr. Tolbert and I discussed the upcoming National Primary Care Week and an interesting photo essay showing people why they believe in Primary Care. To close the show, we discussed Dr. Tolbert's podcast. At the top of this post, you'll see the video of the closing thoughts of the show. At the bottom of this post, you'll see a twitter discussion following the podcast.

You can listen to the show in its entirety below in the player. You can also download the entire audio podcast for Family Medicine Rocks Episode 278 right here. I also encourage you to follow me on twitter, check out the facebook page for this show (and "like" it), and to check out my you tube page with a new TV interview from this past week. Enjoy!

Listen to internet radio with DrMikeSevilla on Blog Talk Radio

 

Download Ep278 Here

Meeting Video Recording Tips

 

This post as well as the video below is intended for attendees for the 2012 Family Medicine Education Consortium meeting in Cleveland, Ohio. If you're reading this, you're considering helping out to video document the meeting. Thanks so much for your consideration!

There are tons of complicated articles out there to help you record great vids. But, if you're using a flip video camera or your smartphone, there are two simple steps that you have to remember when you are recording video interviews at meetings:

1) Adequate Lighting: The most common error that is made is a dark picture because of not enough light. Try to make sure that there is almost a light focused on the subject. You'll see in this video interview that I recorded at the 2010 FMEC meeting - that there was not enough light. In another example from a 2012 meeting, you'll see in this video, the lights initially off, and then magically turn on during the interview. Kinda funny.

2) Little Background Noise: It's very convenient to catch someone just after a session ends, and before they leave the room. The 2nd most common error is not knowing just how much background noise will interfere with the interview. In this first example, here is an interview of me last year that was recorded on a smartphone. You'll hear that breakfast has been going on with the background noise. Would've been easier (but less convenient) to go out into the hall. In the 2nd example, I conduct an interview "behind the scenes" at a meeting in an empty room, with only some music in the background. It's kind of a spoof video, so enjoy that.

There are a lot of other tips that I could give you, but I wanted to keep it simple, Also check out my "tips video" below, and I hope to see you in Cleveland for the FMEC meeting!

Direct Primary Care Interview

Thanks again to Rob Lamberts, MD for being my guest on Family Medicine Rocks Episode 277. He is leaving his current traditional medical practice model for something called "Direct Care" medicine which is a subscription model in which patients pay a monthly fee. Dr. Rob states that his patients will have better access to him in this model, which includes electronic communication like e-mail.

In the midst of our conversation, he describes how he came to this decision. He's frustrated (like many of us primary care physicians) with the current health care system, and he felt that he could not transform his practice from within. So, he decided to start his new practice from scratch.

At the end of the interview, we reminisced about when we first started blogging about 5 years ago. My, how times have changed in the healthcare social media space. In the video above, Dr. Rob gave some reflective comments to close the show.

You can listen to the show in the player below. You can also download Family Medicine Rocks Episode 277 here or below. Welcome to those of you who are new to this site. I invite you to check you the podcast site (which includes our iTunes link), the facebook page for this website, my youtube page, my twitter feed, and my linked in page. Enjoy!

Listen to internet radio with DrMikeSevilla on Blog Talk Radio

 

Download Ep277 Here

Kevin MD at #eDTC2012

 

Our pal Kevin MD presented in Washington, DC this morning at the eDTC Revolution 2012 Conference. From looking at their website, looks like it was primarily a pharma crowd. I presented at an industry conference in San Francisco and let me tell you, it was a little bit of a tough crowd. Those pharma people really want and need access to physicians/providers.

Below are the tweets (via storify) from his talk via the hashtag to the conference #eDTC2012. I don't know if he is making his slides available, but you'll get a good idea of his talk from the tweets. Enjoy and have a great weekend everybody!

 

Doctor Rob Tonight Live 8pm ET

 

I'm excited to welcome Rob Lamberts, MD (otherwise known as @doc_rob on twitter) on the podcast for Family Medicine Rocks Episode 277 LIVE at 8pm Eastern Time Tonight on BlogTalkRadio.

On his new website, Doctor Rob announces that he is leaving is primary care group to create a solo practice using a model of care called "Direct Care." This has also been called "Direct Primary Care" or "Direct Medicine." This quote is from his website.

Direct care has several things that define it as such

  1. Insurance is not accepted
  2. Patients pay a monthly subscription fee for access
  3. Office visits are free or very low cost
  4. Patients have much more access to their doctor via phone, internet, or immediate appointment availability
  5. The number of patients is kept relatively small 

During tonight's program, I'll be asking him the process by which he made this decision to start his own solo practice. In addition, you may have read about this different model of practice that is starting to pop up out there in America. I am in what is considered a traditional patient practice model right now, and I have many questions about the logistics of how something like this would work.

Doctor Rob was my first guest on the old Doctor Anonymous Show podcast. Just for fun, I have included the audio player for Show Number 5 below which took place five years ago this month. Doctor Rob was calling in from a medical conference, and I mainly asked him about blogging back then. This five year old show is a great looking glass into where medical social media was back then. Download Show Number 5 here.

So, I hope you can listen to our conversation tonight, Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 8pm Eastern Time on Blogtalkradio for Family Medicine Rocks Episode 277. As always, if you cannot listen live, you can download the archived podcast later and listen anytime. Hope you can join us!

Listen to internet radio with DrMikeSevilla on Blog Talk Radio

 

Download Doctor Anonymous Show 5 Here

Is Social Media Over?

 

This post is inspired by the facebook update by my long time social media friend Dr Gwenn. And, I know that this post is going to sound like I'm an "old guy" of social media ("Hey kids, get off of my lawn" LOL). I started blogging six years ago, and, at that time, the community was very small - especially the medical social media community.

But, as the natural evolution of media goes, as things get more "mainstream" (however you define that), more and more commercialization comes about (defined by Dr. Gwenn above as corporate robots). With that comes discussions about topics like this: "Scheduled tweets: Yes or No."

So, do I long of those "old" days (just a few years ago) of medical social media? Of course. It's getting more and more difficult to navigate through the fluff to get to the quality content. It's even gotten to the point where there have been apps and sites created to help us sort through the information overload.

This entire whiny post can be encapsulated in the video below from one of my fave cartoons of all time: A Charilie Brown Christmas when Charlie Brown says, "My own dog gone commercial. I can't stand it." Yup, that sums it up. And, yeah, I'm talking to you. Get off my lawn you kids LOL

Deconstructing @BurbDoc

 

In the twitter medicine world, @BurbDoc is one of the most intriguing, yet polarizing individuals out there. I really should not be posting this essay because of the e-mails that I received today about my previous post. A lot of people out there viciously defend what @BurbDoc does, which I find very interesting.

What really was interesting to me was the tweet about "gallows humor" and venting. For those who don't know, I was anonymous once out here on the internet as @DoctorAnonymous. So, I definitely understand and lived that point of view.

Shifting to today's @BurbDoc tweets, they are below courtesy of storify. Even though it was on twitter, the tweets was essentially a long blog post - 140 characters at a time. I saw this unfold in real time today. And, if you don't know anything about "Meaningful Use," the one thing that you are able to gather is that it is a bunch of "clicks."

So, do I think @BurbDoc is all bad - Well no. Do I think that @BurbDoc is all good - Well no. (I welcome all the hate mail that you're going to send me - HA!). I do think that @BurbDoc is a real doctor (not a fake), on the west coast of the US (guess), who is finding a unique way of self-expression. Once you cut through the cussing and the thick sarcasm, there is painful truth there about our broken health care system. Am I wrong? Let me know :)

Twitter: Professionalism Vs Parody

 

I know it's not news that there is conflict on social media. In a recent example, a flamewar happened on yelp following a pizza owner giving the President a bear hug. Comments started, then supports from both sides weighed in, and we're off to the races.

Example two: Everyone in the medical social media world remember what happened a year and a half ago (has it been that long already), when a blog post was written by our good friend @Doctor_V pointing out some tweets from @mommy_doctor. That blog post, entitled "Unprofessional Physician Behavior on Twitter," had 129 comments and had to be closed to further comments. There were numerous other blog posts written about this. I even did an entire podcast on the topic, which was one of the most exhausting podcasts I have done.

This most recent episode occurred on September 9-10, 2012 on twitter. The tweets are below for your review via the service called storify. It started out with a doctor making a comment about a patient and a patient objecting to the negative characterization about the patient. The doctor then states that this is "gallows humor" and a means of venting. Someone else asked the question about the role of self-censorship in social media. The patient closes the twitter war with this point: "treat me like I was there in front of you, IRL it is pretty simple."

I mean, this is nothing new that is happening. But, it is an opportunity to re-open the topic about twitter behavior. Is there a certain etiquette that should be followed? How far is too far to push things on twitter and other social media outlets? Or, is it as simple as "just unfollow me" on twitter and that's the end of it. What do you think?